Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 00:13

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Brain Fatigue: How the Mind Decides When to Push or Quit - Neuroscience News
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Exclusive | New York to Build One of First U.S. Nuclear-Power Plants in Generation - WSJ
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How many wishes do people get on their birthday?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What does it feel like to "lose your looks" to age?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Owen Wilson Brings Clever, Funny “Stick” in Under Par - Roger Ebert